The Middle Path: Why I Voted “No” on a Plan I Largely Support
Politics often demands simple answers to complex questions. You are either for or against; yes or no; win or lose. But authentic leadership usually lives in the uncomfortable middle—the space where good policy must meet the integrity of the democratic process.
Recently, the modernized Official Community Plan (OCP) was ratified by the Cowichan Valley Regional District with a 7–3 vote. I was one of the three “no” votes. To some, this may seem contradictory. I support much of the policy direction for Area G. Still, leadership isn’t just about the destination—it’s about the journey, and whether the public trust needed for long-term planning truly exists across our region.
Evolution, Not Erasure
Much of Saltair is currently zoned at one acre or larger. In the 1990s, this was a necessity; smaller lots relying on older septic technology created serious public health concerns. Today, that context has changed.
Advances in septic engineering mean those constraints no longer apply in the same way. Responsible planning requires us to revisit old assumptions with modern tools, rather than clinging to the status quo simply because it is familiar. Area G is not meeting its 20-year housing targets, and we cannot ignore that reality.
The updates in Saltair are measured and incremental, affecting less than 10 percent of properties. This is not blanket upzoning; it is careful, locally informed planning that:
- Protects our character: Safeguarding the rural beauty that defines us.
- Supports families: Providing flexibility for accessory dwelling units so families can stay together.
- Promotes smart growth: Ensuring development fits the community rather than overwhelming it.
The Regional Trust Gap
If the policy for Area G is sound, why vote “no”? Because my oath of office requires me to represent the entire region.
During the public hearings, a stark contrast emerged. While Area G was largely supportive, hundreds of residents from neighbouring Areas E, F, and I strongly opposed it. This was not a fringe movement; it included forest landowners, industry operators, Advisory Planning Commission Chairs, and representatives from other levels of government.
Public hearings are the heartbeat of local democracy. When they reveal a broad, sustained trust gap across multiple areas, it is a signal to slow down and listen. Supporting the OCP at that moment would have been an endorsement of a process that many found rushed. Good policy cannot succeed without “social license,” and trust cannot be forced to meet a deadline.
Moving Forward: From Policy to Practice
It is essential to be clear about where we stand today: The Modernized OCP has passed and is now in effect. While I voted “no” to signal that the process needed more work, the democratic decision has been made. My role now—as your Director—is to ensure this plan is implemented responsibly, fairly, and successfully.
For Area G, there is much to be optimistic about. The policy direction reflects years of local input and delivers the practical tools that property owners have been asking for. My focus is now firmly on making this work for us by:
- Hosting regular community meetings to ensure ongoing, transparent engagement.
- Advocating for infrastructure to ensure growth is well-served and sustainable.
- Exploring economic resilience by looking at industrial land expansion on the west side of the island highway to support local jobs.
Responsible Leadership
My vote was never about standing in the way of progress; it was about standing up for regional legitimacy. Now that the path is set, I am committed to doing the work that comes next—supporting Saltair’s evolution while continuing to push for better collaboration across the entire Cowichan Valley.
That is what responsible leadership looks like: respecting the decision, supporting the community, and staying committed to the work ahead.
Thanks,
Jesse McClinton B.A., MSc. Director for CVRD Area G
